Home > Blog > How Google+ compares to Facebook
Foolproof blog

How Google+ compares to Facebook

By Alex Bentley on 28 July 2011

Original post by former Foolproofer Dan Sorvik.

So, I jumped on board the Google+ train. I filled out my profile, added some people to circles but now what? What can Google+ (G+) offer that other networks (namely Facebook) don’t?

Here’s my interpretation of where G+ currently compares to other social networks in some key categories:
 

Targeting posts

Although Facebook allows you to create lists, no one does it. It’s time consuming and people don’t see the benefit…until now. You know that post you don’t want your colleagues or your mom to see? You can create lists and circles in both Facebook and G+, but G+ really emphasises the use of circles both when adding people and when posting. This means you know exactly which groups will see your content every time you post.
 

Finding friends

Well, I’ve already found them on Facebook and at least on Facebook I have to accept their ‘friend request’. On G+ they add you more like Twitter, meaning they can follow you automatically (you can still block if you really want to). G+ is currently 20 million early adopters strong. The pace is slowing and getting non-tech innovators to come into this space will be a painful process. Also, there is no one on G+ that’s not on Facebook, at least not in my network.
 

Brands

You cannot create pages for your company in G+ at this stage. They won’t be rolling this out until later in the year. Instead, some brands are being linked to a single person. For example, I wanted to follow Mashable, but instead I’m following some guy called Pete Cashmore. This really confused me the first few times I saw him in my stream. Where Twitter and Facebook allow companies to have their own voice, G+ does not… yet. They are currently trialling a few brands and will open this up to all companies later this year.
 

Job hunting

This could be a great networking tool, but the employment information and access to skill sets and experience are not as robust as LinkedIn and so far you will only find tech savvy early adopters. If that’s what you’re looking for, great! This also ties into the idea of targeting posts, as you can be sure your work people can’t see posts about job hunting.
 

Microblogging

Twitter has strong control over this side of things. We know that twitter can be a great way to explore brand sentiment because of the amount of content that is being produced across a wide demographic. Like tweets at a UX conference, it’s an echo chamber. Why tell everyone around you about what’s happening around you? I want new ideas from all corners of my networks! Until the demographics of this network shift from early adopters to the general public, this will continue to be the case.
 

Sharing content

The +1 feature on G+ is just another version of ‘Like’ or any of the other sharing sites (Stumbled Upon, Digg). About time you joined the party Google. Furthermore, from what I’ve been seeing over the last few weeks, all the content that is shared is reflective content about the platform itself. I want to see embarrassing photos of my friends, funny kitten videos and rants about what’s happening in your life, not the latest news on G+.
 

Privacy

Something that has been a contentious issue for Facebook. And what is Google’s response? You must have a public profile or you’re kicked out come July 31st. A little bit of a tough stance if you ask me. But don’t worry, all privacy settings can be changed and amended in a slightly more user-friendly way than Facebook, but no profile can be hidden completely.
 

Chat/Video

One of the main unique selling points for G+ is the video conferencing tool, “Hangout”. I have to give them some credit for offering such a great service…But I would need more people online to use it. I could see this being useful for both the workplace and for friends. But wait! Isn’t that Skype I see in Facebook’s back pocket? Watch this space…
 

Overall, I think G+ is making a good attempt and is gaining traction with the techies. I think they have a good chance if Facebook is slow to respond with easier to create lists and video conferencing. Also, the population growth for G+ will need to continue to expand beyond early adopters and move into the mainstream – how they promote this will be interesting to watch over the next few weeks and months.

 

What do you think?
29/07/11 Stewart said:
Interesting stuff. Like everyone else I like the concepts behind the Circles and how they are manifested in the interface: they reflect my behaviour in dirt vs digital worlds much more closely. But I think they are solving the wrong problem. I read a post by Mark Hurst (of Good Experience fame) where he put his finger on it. The main problem most people have on Facebook is how to sort through the volumes of *incoming* messages. Circles don't help with that - yet anyway. For people that post a lot, apparently they mostly want their stuff seen by as many people as possible. So circles add little or no value for them. For me though Google+ has a bigger problem. What is it's purpose? When Facebook started it had a clear purpose. Where is Google+'s? I can see a lot of people trying it out and then never using it again.
Leave your comment:
 

Similar Articles
By author By topic
About the author
Alex Bentley

As Programme Manager, I am responsible for the company’s larger programmes of work, using 7 or so years of IT and digital marketing PM experience to provide assistance ...

Read profile

Alex Bentley
Call us on
+44 (0) 20 7539 3840
Follow
Follow via Facebook Follow via Twitter Follow via Linkedin Follow via RSS Feed