Three old chestnuts cracked
06 Apr 2011
06 Apr 2011
Over two decades I have encountered plenty of people who question whether research has any place within design. Nowadays these tend to fall into two camps: dimwits and the very inexperienced. Most organisations have learnt that unleashing complex or commercially important design into the world without some form of user research is dangerous – to both revenue and careers.
However, I do from time to time still encounter naysayers. These people tend to be harmless enough except they do have a habit of wheeling out a quote to help lend weight to their argument. I’ve had a bit of a deeper look at three of these which particularly get my goat. Hopefully this will arm you with something to say next time one of these gets wheeled out.
“If I’d asked people what they wanted, they’d have asked for a faster horse.” Henry Ford, no source.
I’ve found no convincing evidence that Henry Ford ever said this. None of the repetitions of this quote online come with an original source. Furthermore, I’ve found no references to its use earlier than 2003. (Thanks to Patrick Vlaskovits who created a clever search hack for this.)
When I contacted the Henry Ford Museum they said: “In the past research on this topic has not yielded satisfactory results either for the researcher or the research staff. Mr. Ford wrote numerous articles for a variety of periodicals and newspapers and the quotes attributed to him were varied and often unsubstantiated.”
But as a counterpoint I can source a Ford quote which I think is more useful:
“If there is any one secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person’s point of view and see things from that person’s angle as well as from your own” Henry Ford, quoted in, How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie, 1937.
This quote is at least contemporary to Henry Ford and, appearing in an international bestseller, it would have stood a chance of coming to Mr Ford’s attention if he had a problem with its use.
“We do no market research.” Steve Jobs, Fortune Magazine, March 2008
This one is harder to handle because there’s no doubt that Mr Jobs actually said it. It’s important to consider the context here though: the quote comes from an article which describes how Apple formulates its business strategy.
It’s not possible to argue the point more widely except to say it’s well documented that Apple pays close attention to customer feedback and satisfaction surveys. Apple are very private about how they work and how they develop products and services. And good luck to them, it is part of an extremely successful brand strategy. I might cheekily observe though that Apple’s privacy statement on their site says:
How we use your personal information
We may also use personal information for internal purposes such as auditing, data analysis, and research to improve Apple’s products, services, and customer communications.
So if they are not doing customer research now, then at least their terms don’t seem to completely rule it out in the future. If you catch my drift.
My response to this quote when it’s used in conversation (oh and it is, again and again) is to point out that if your interlocutor, and everyone that works in their organisation, is as skilled and as focussed on design as Steve Jobs and everyone at Apple… then, yes, maybe we can think again about the role of research.
”The trouble with market research is that people don’t think how they feel, they don’t say what they think and they don’t do what they say.” David Ogilvy, no source.
Actually, this one is relatively new on the scene, but as an alumnus of Ogilvy & Mather I hate to see his name taken in vain. Again, I can’t find any kind of original source.
That said, let’s credit this thought to Mr Ogilvy because it is a) well written and b) completely true. That is one of the problems of doing research. However, what it should tell you is not to stop doing research, but to do it carefully. Maybe even (crazy idea) get professional researchers to do it for you.
The main reason I take exception with this quote is that in everything he published Ogilvy, who started his career as a researcher, says that research is a vital ingredient in great advertising. In his book Ogilvy on Advertising he devotes an entire chapter to it called “18 miracles of research” which starts with the words:
“Advertising people who ignore research are as dangerous as generals who ignore decodes of enemy signals.”
And ends with:
“The late, great Bill Bernbach… thought that it inhibited creativity. My experience has been the opposite.”
So why do some people and organisations bridle at the idea of conducting user research as part of the design process? I’ve come up with a list of reasons which ascend from the superficial up to the credible.
Simply put there are some people out there who find research boring and would prefer to be doing something else. In my line of work life would be easier if these people all agreed to wear a t-shirt saying this. In fact what they will tend to do is start using quotes like the ones above.
Sometimes we will encounter people who are genuinely worried that conducting research sends a signal to the rest of their organisation that their experience and understanding of customer needs is inadequate. More common in this group though are people who fear that research will tell them something they don’t want to hear: like their creative idea stinks, or that the board’s strategy is flawed, or that they’ll have to take longer to fix stuff to make it work.
Which of course it doesn’t (see Mr Ogilvy above), but it does sometimes restrict creative people. The point is that research helps you understand the areas into which you should channel creative thought, whether that be a big idea for a new service, or a little idea for how to improve a form field.
If my barber gave me a bad haircut and cited this as the reason I would question whether he’d really thought out how he did his job. The same applies to marketing and design projects.
Some companies like Virgin, Apple and Amstrad have cultures which celebrate and encourage bold decision-making and acting on gut instinct. I’ve met Richard Branson a few times and he showed an innate understanding of what it’s like to be a customer and applies that into decisions which are right for his business. The trouble is that in an organisation with tens of thousands of people not every employee is going to have that same talent. But if they feel empowered (or even compelled) to rely only on their own judgement in a design decision this can create really bad outcomes for both the business and the individual.
This is by far the most common reason I’ve encountered as to why people fail to conduct research during design. It’s horrible to see clients (often really nice and reasonable people) sleepwalking into really high-risk decisions. They are often surrounded by creative agencies and advisors who aren’t adequately invested in the risks their ideas are creating.
This final point is a truly reasonable and rational objection to conducting design research. It puts the onus on user research and UCD people to think carefully about the methods they use, the timing and scale of research activities and the rigour of their recommendations. Of which, I’m sure, Henry Ford would approve.
Reflecting on our three quotes, there is of course wisdom in all of them. A theme that runs through each one is the futility of starting a design process by directly asking customers what you should build for them. But you can quite easily harness the creativity and energy of customers into your design process by using alternative research techniques.
The role of research in user-centred design is to support iterative development of ideas and interactions. The customer does not replace the creative designer, but becomes a partner in the design process – helping the designer to test, tune and develop their thinking at each step of the design process.
Mr Ford, Mr Jobs and Mr Ogilvy are all smart people who were making a specific point about the role of research. We do them a disservice if we use their words out of context and to justify a view that customers should be excluded from design.